Greetings from JuergenGreetings from Juergen

There's something quietly stubborn happening in studios right now, and I keep running into it. Manabu Kosaka builds paper replicas of vintage cameras so precise that the film advance lever actually moves. Iyo Hasegawa stacks wrenches into furniture that can be disassembled back into a toolbox. Issey Miyake's studio turns pleating scraps into chairs. These aren't people who ran out of conventional materials. They're people making a point — about patience, about process, about the stubborn insistence that how you make something is inseparable from what it means. I'm not sure any of them would frame it that way, which is probably why it lands.

What strikes me is that none of this is precious in the way that word usually implies. Zim & Zou reconstruct boomboxes from hand-cut colored paper — every speaker grid, every cassette reel — and it reads less like nostalgia than like a mild act of defiance. Rushera takes discarded plastic and melts it into coral-like forms, which is either hopeful or devastating depending on how long you sit with it. The materials in this issue are humble, often waste, occasionally ridiculous. The results are anything but. This week I'm thinking about what it means to resist the path of least resistance — and whether that resistance is itself becoming a kind of aesthetic.

The Intersect: Art In Tech  

Definitely Not AI

Sculpture


Sustainability in Art and Tech


The Last WordThe Last Word

Thanks for reading this week. I keep coming back to this question of whether making things slowly and deliberately — with your hands, with waste, with patience — is a genuine resistance or whether it's already been absorbed into its own kind of aesthetic category. I'm not sure I know the answer, and I'm not sure I trust anyone who does. If any of this is landing differently for you — especially if you work with physical materials yourself — I'd genuinely love to hear about it. Hit reply.

Best, Juergen

The Intersect: Art In Tech